Publication (Technical report): Sand slugs and stream degradation: the case of the granite creeks, North-east Victoria
Publication Type:Technical report / Consultancy
Publication Name:Sand slugs and stream degradation: the case of the granite creeks, North-east Victoria



Reference Information


Davis, J. and Finlayson, B. (2000) Sand slugs and stream degradation: the case of the granite creeks, North-east Victoria. Technical Report 7/2000, CRCFE, Canberra.




Hide details for Optional InformationOptional Information

Attached document(s):
Show details for unnamed section
ISBN:
1876810483
Other information:
Hide details for unnamed section

Full report attached below
(PDF 2.1MB)
    Sand Slugs and Stream Degradation: the Case of the Granite Creeks, North-east Victoria
    Jennifer Davis & Brian Finlayson
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction
1
1.1. Background and content
1
1.2. Objectives and approach
2
1.3. Report outline
3
2. Catchment descriptions
5
2.1. Introduction
5
2.2. A general description
5
2.2.1. Climate and hydrology
6
2.2.2. Geology, geomorphology, pedology and stream condition
6
2.2.3. Land use and vegetative cover
8
2.3. Other physical characteristics
8
3. Methods
11
3.1. Introduction
11
3.2. Historical analysis
11
3.2.1. Documentary evidence
11
3.2.2. Anecdotal evidence
12
3.2.3. Historic cross-section data
12
3.3. Assessing present condition
13
3.3.1. Field inspections
13
3.3.2. Sediment budget
13
3.3.3. Sediment tracing using particle size distributions
14
3.3.4. Scour chains
19
3.3.5. Suspended load sampling
22
3.3.6. Bedload sampling
24
4. Analysis of historical evidence: establishing baseline conditions
and potential erosion triggers
27
4.1. Introduction
27
4.2. Explorers and the Overlanders
27
4.3. Pastoral runs
28
4.4. The Granite Creeks area in the second half of the nineteenth century
29
4.4.1. Creek morphology
30
4.5. The Creightons Creek area in the 20th century
34
4.5.1. Creightons Creek: the hill country
34
4.5.2. Creightons Creek: the flats
38
4.6. Evidence of erosion and sedimentation along Castle Creek
and Pranjip–Nine Mile Creek
41
4.6.1. Castle Creek
41
4.6.2. Pranjip–Nine Mile Creek
45
4.7. Potential sources of disturbance
47
4.8. Patterns of aggradation
54
4.9. Pre-settlement erosion and aggradation
56
4.10. Conclusions
57
5. Assessing present condition
59
5.1. Field observations
59
5.1.1. Erosion
59
5.1.2. Aggradation
63
5.2. Sediment budget
65
5.3. Sediment tracing using particle size distributions
66
5.3.1. Fine fraction method
66
5.3.2. Histogram comparison
68
5.3.3. Coarse fraction method
70
5.3.4. McLaren technique
71
5.4. Scour chains
79
5.5. Bedload sampling
82
5.5.1. Bedload transport rates
83
5.5.2. Particle size distributions
84
5.5.3. Dune movement
85
5.6. Synthesis
85
6. Discussion of results
87
6.1. Introduction
87
6.2. Objective and hypotheses
87
6.3. Implications for rehabilitation
88
6.3.1. Introduction
88
6.3.2. Minimising further sediment input
88
6.3.3.Sand slug movement
89
6.3.4. Improving the in-stream environment on the sand slug
92
7. Conclusion
93
7.1. The Granite Creeks
93
7.2. Beyond the Granite Creeks
94
7.2.1. Methodological outcomes
94
7.2.2. Final outcomes
94
References
97
Appendix A
102
Appendix B
104
Appendix C
106
Other publications by the CRC for Freshwater Ecology
107
Acronyms and explanation of some terms
vii
Abstract:
Show details for unnamed section





Show details for search classificationsSearch classifications





Show details for AdministrationAdministration